home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT3042>
- <title>
- Nov. 20, 1989: White Lies, Bad Polls
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Nov. 20, 1989 Freedom!
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 56
- White Lies, Bad Polls
- </hdr><body>
- <p> Before last week's unexpectedly close Virginia contest,
- Pollster Harrison Hickman got revealing results by making an
- offbeat correlation. When white voters were questioned by white
- pollsters, Hickman found, they favored Republican Marshall
- Coleman by 16 points. But when whites were telephoned by
- interviewers with recognizably black intonation, they leaned to
- Douglas Wilder by 10 points.
- </p>
- <p> The fact that Americans are notoriously unreliable when
- answering questions related to race was dramatically evident in
- the Virginia and New York City elections. Although several
- surveys in the final fortnight gave Wilder and David Dinkins
- comfortable leads (as high as 15 points for Wilder and 18 points
- for Dinkins), both contests turned out to be squeakers.
- </p>
- <p> The phenomenon is not new: seven years ago, Los Angeles
- Mayor Tom Bradley seemed to be leading in California's
- gubernatorial election -- until the ballots were counted and he
- lost by less than a point. Some whites were reluctant to admit
- to pollsters that they planned to vote against a black.
- </p>
- <p> Racism in the crude sense does not necessarily motivate
- people to misinform pollsters, Hickman says. Rather, some
- respondents succumb to a misguided urge to give answers they
- think will please the questioner. Whatever the reason, pollsters
- in black-white contests should learn to take the discrepancy
- into account -- at least until such racial match-ups cease to
- be novelties.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-